I'd like to see this standardized too. Side note: I would also be interested to get a return of experience from people operating qname minimization at scale, the type of issues encountered, what are the ratios of such errors.... hint @marek :)
Manu On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:35 PM Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, tjw ietf wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track? > > > > I’d like to see a more fleshed out operational considerations section. > > That would be good indeed. Especially with respect to broken DNS load > balancers. > > I have enabled it in Fedora from the start and did run into a few problem > domains, and some people turning it off. But that happened less than I > had expected. Red Hat did not yet enable this in RHEL7 but it is planned > to be enabled in RHEL8. > > But I do believe qname minimisation is an important privacy enhancing > technology that we should strongly promote as a standards track > document. > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
