In article <9da145f4-df6a-4bfa-b3c9-56027b228...@iis.se> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >In table 2 on page 9, the draft refers to RFC 2782 for _dccp and _sctp (SRV), >but those “_node names” >are not even mentioned in the RFC. Are they defined elsewhere?
RFC 2782 says that SRV's are named with _proto where proto is is a protocol name. RFCs 3588 and 6733 say to do _sctp SRV lookups, but don't further define them, and only have 2782 as an informative reference. No RFC mentions _dccp. It seems to me that 2782 is the right reference for _sctp. For _dccp we've had arguments about whether 2782 says that a SRV can be named by any protocol so maybe we should put in every protocol in the IANA registry. That's a lot of dead protocols. A reasonable compromise would be to start the registry with the names that have some evidence of being used somewhere, so we could drop _dccp >In the same table, the draft refers to RFC 7553 for a number of URI _node >names, but the references are quite >indirect. Could references to relevant IANA registries be added? Since RFC 7553 is the place that says that the enumservice names turn into _node names, I think that's the right reference. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
