On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 05:42:04PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote: > I also agree with Tim's observation the other day that if this is just a > new RRType, then expert review is all that is procedurally required and > it'd be a generous extension of what is required to document the > implementation and use of the new RRType in the RFC series.
A good point. Technically, I don't think there's anything in ZONEMD that couldn't be implemented with TXT; using a dedicated rrtype for the purpose is mere convenience. -- Evan Hunt -- [email protected] Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
