On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote:
> The server is specifying the retry delay, so if the client adds > randomness, that could result in more collisions rather than fewer. > > >> S 8.2. >> > The table below indicates, for each of the three TLVs defined in >> this >> > document, whether they are valid in each of ten different contexts. >> > >> > The first five contexts are requests or unacknowledged messages >> from >> > client to server, and the corresponding responses from server back >> to >> > client: >> >> Nit. This text is a tiny bit hard to read, because you don't list S-P, >> etc. >> > > Hm, I believe that this should be using the requester/responder > vernacular, not the client/server vernacular. I've asked the team to > confirm. > No, in fact I was incorrect about this. I've added text to explain the S-* messages as well.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
