> On Sep 24, 2018, at 11:14 AM, 神明達哉 <[email protected]> wrote: > > At Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:31:50 +0800, > Davey Song <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I just submited a new draft intending to provide better connectivity from > > network side function . Comments are welcome. > > Some quick observations: > > - I don't see why the intended status is Standards Track. It seems to > be a document about an operational practice rather than a new > protocol feature.
I think we would have a charter problem as well. V6ops, per charter, can produce BCPs and informational documents. > - In general, I wouldn't be excited about placing such complicated > functionality in the network rather than end hosts. Sometimes it > may be justified as a least evil option, but the current description > of the draft didn't fully convince me > > - I suspect the discussion on breaking DNSSEC is way too hand-waving. > In my general understanding it's generally not accepted at dnsop to > justify breaking DNSSEC just by saying "it's okay as validation at > end hosts is not typical". Especially if it really intends to be > published as Standards Track I suspect some more detailed discussion > with a stronger justification will be needed. > > -- > JINMEI, Tatuya > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win. Sun Tzu
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
