Jari, thank you for your review. Geoff, thanks for your responses. I have entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Aug 30, 2018, at 10:10 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net> wrote: > > Thanks for the responses, Geoff. > > One minor follow-up: > >> The final point I am not so convinced about. The reason is scope of the >> document. This document is an instruction to folk who write DNS recursive >> resolvers. It is not an instruction to folk who want to set up zones that >> could be used to test KSK trust status. I would rather avoid adding text >> about the latter topic in this document, as I strongly prefer to leave it to >> others who may be sufficiently motivated to write a document about how to >> set up a measurement zone. > > Oh, I do agree with this. However, as a reader I wasn’t sure if the document > expects that there be an existing name (with the special labels) or none is > needed. Does all this work fine, even if I don’t add anything to the sites > being used in the test? That might be worth clarifying, if it isn’t somewhere > already. > > Jari > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > gen-...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
