HI Duane, On Oct 24, 2018, at 11:57, Wessels, Duane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Personally I feel like keeping the Reserved field is potentially useful in > the future, but harmless if it never gets used. Can you say more about why > keeping it prevents independent work? I would also appreciate more words on that. To my mind it's better to have a reserved field that is never used than to need a new field in the future and not have a reserved field to redefine. > I would be very happy with standards track, but to the extent the WG is > skeptical I would settle for experimental at this time. I am mainly interested in a stable specification. I don't care what label is applied to it. If the DNS specification ever matures to the point where we need a standards-track specification for any practical reason, cutting a new rev of this document is surely the tiniest atom of extra work imagineable. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
