Brian Dickson <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it might be good to scope the 6761 issue, with something like the > following:
[SNIP] > > I.e. it is necessary to recognize all special use names, and necessary to > > not resolve such names via DNS. That's going too far: special-use domain names must have specific instructions to application authors, which might say not to use the DNS or might say to use the DNS as usual. David Schinazi's comment on the GitHub issue about referring to the IANA registry is good, and perhaps more useful than referring to RFCs directly. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Trafalgar: Northeast 3 or 4, increasing 5 at times. Moderate. Fair. Good. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
