+1. I we should not adopt this draft for all the reasons all ready presented in the thread and also the draft text regarding "moving all DNS over TCP”.
regards John On 21 Jan 2019, at 10:41, Ralf Weber wrote: > Moin! > > On 21 Jan 2019, at 11:26, Ondřej Surý wrote: >>> On 21 Jan 2019, at 11:22, Peter van Dijk <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> Please do not adopt. >> >> +1 to everything that Peter said. I’ve been opposing ATR draft from the >> very beginning. We can’t be removing EDNS workarounds and at the same time >> slap another workaround into the DNS. > Another +1 for not adopting this draft. I wonder if there is a coincidence > that the end of the adoption call is on the same date as DNS Flag day ;-). > > If I recall the presentation that lead to this correct it is mostly an IPv6 > problem and given the nature of DNS it will only occur if all name servers > are on v6. Having one v6 name server that will respond correct with fragments > also solves the problem. I think the problem space is to narrow to burden > this problem on all resolvers. > > So long > -Ralf > —-- > Ralf Weber > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop John Dickinson https://sinodun.com Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd. Magdalen Centre Oxford Science Park Robert Robinson Avenue Oxford OX4 4GA U.K.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
