> On 7 Feb 2019, at 23:36, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that it should be checked, but I really want to be able to point at > something in 1034 / 1035 which says this. > Tony's below is close, but not quite there yet - it says they should be the > same, but not that it is an error in the zone file (the section is "5.2. Use > of master files to define zones") if they are not. So, can y'all help me find > evidence *from this timeframe* that shows that this was viewed as true at > that time? >
RFC 1033: > NS records for a domain exist in both the zone that delegates the domain, and > in the domain itself. This says they can’t be missing from the domain itself. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
