On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, Warren Kumari wrote:
Section 1.2. Updating Algorithm Requirement Levels says: "[RFC2119] considers the term SHOULD equivalent to RECOMMENDED, and SHOULD NOT equivalent to NOT RECOMMENDED. The authors of this document have chosen to use the terms RECOMMENDED and NOT RECOMMENDED, as this more clearly expresses the recommendations to implementers."Actually, RFC2119 doesn't really contain NOT RECOMMENDED --- but, RFC8174 ("Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words"), which updates RFC2119 *does*. Can the authors please resubmit with the new boilerplate from RFC8174 in Section 2 (Conventions Used in This Document) and I'll kick off IETF LC.
done: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-05 Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
