On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 12:25, Tony Finch <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 21 Feb 2019, at 6:30 am, Tony Finch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Does it need to be per-record? Why not GC the whole RRset? > > > > Because there are scenarios where you do want to GC as single > > record from the RRset. AD has them with SRV. Each server adds > > its own SRV record to the RRset. > > Oh I see, that makes sense. Things like this need explaining in the > document. > > Why not simplify the RDATA format so there is just one item per record, > instead of containing a list of lists? Aren't the individual items going > to be added/removed independently of each other? >
Good idea. A more radical approach would be to have just one hash per item per record. This has the attraction of allowing a truncated hash to be used, without the need for length fields. --Dick
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
