On Mon, 18 Feb 2019, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:47 PM Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote:
I think this document should be Experimental and not Standards Track?
I was torn when i did the first revision of this. I think it depends
on the stability of Decentralized Identifiers themselves. Once that
schema becomes widely used, i think any protocol that connects the DNS
and DIDs should be Standards Track. But i leave that up to "higher
forces" as soon as i find a suitable "home WG" for that.
My idea was that if this is an IRTF document, not a DNSOP document, that
it cannot be standards track? But I might be wrong about this.
Agreed. I've considered replacing the "instruction diff" to OpenPGP
with a full description in the document itself.
that would be better, but with an informative reference so indeed people
know this is the "common way" of doing this and not custom to this
document.
Yep, introduces a zone cut. Then again, i'm not sure what (if we
introduce that schema above) the semantics of a record right unter
_did would be.. Or would that be disallowed?
I would avoid putting something there directly, yes.
So, would you be interested to discuss this in Prague?
Sure. I will also be in Prague the week before at NetDev.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
