(dropping dprive list at WG chair request) Hiya,
On 13/03/2019 20:29, Brian Dickson wrote: > The starting place for the conversation needs to acknowledge this, and > accommodate it. It is entirely possible that a DoH client that doesn't do a > minimum level of getting user acknowledgement before violating policies, > laws, or contracts, might itself be illegal in some jurisdictions > (jurisdictions that could include some US states, some western countries, > some larger entities like EU, etc.). I almost agreed with you that people need to ack others' priorities. But the above means I can't agree with your mail as "might be illegal" is vastly overstated, there being no relevant difference between DoT and DoH clients in this respect. Such overstatement doesn't help and merely makes it more likely that some of the reasonable points you make will just get lost in the noise (IMO anyway). The same goes for talk of "wars" btw. Cheers, S.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
