Bill Woodcock wrote on 2019-03-22 10:13:


On Mar 22, 2019, at 12:53 AM, Vittorio Bertola
<[email protected]> wrote: If DoH
deployment continues this way, I do see some governments - even in
Europe - trying to go in that direction, either by mandating the
use of in-country resolvers…

India has already started down that path, and it looks like the UK
may not be all that far behind.

all statements made to date by the india and united kingdom governments have indicated that their plans to support in-country RDNS will not be mandatory, just as canada's (operated by CIRA) is not mandatory.

i think if some country is intelligent enough to realize that america's tech companies are seeing an advantageous flow of in-country PII (that being the combination of end-user IP addresses and third-party intents such as DNS lookups), and that this puts their economy at some risk, they should (or perhaps SHOULD or even MUST) compete against ibm, cisco, google, and cloudflare in order to keep this PII in-country and subject to local law.

it's the only rational defense against this data grab, and i applaud it.

--
P Vixie

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to