Kenji Baheux <[email protected]> writes: > * We are considering a first milestone where Chrome would do an automatic > upgrade to DoH when a user’s existing resolver is capable of it.
Sorry for the delayed question, but with respect to this bullet: 1) Do you have evidence that DOH is faster than DOT, since speed was one of your goals? 2) What other reasons are you considering when doing DOH instead of DOT to protect privacy. Specifically, you're preferring DOH but your stated goals are "Stronger privacy and security." and "Hopefully, some performance wins.", without providing rational for each of the potential solutions. DNS plain clearly doesn't meet the first, but likely does the second. But you fail to provide a goal that distinguishes why you'd prefer DOT vs DOH to meet both these goals. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
