Re: [DNSOP] proposal: Covert in-band zone data

[Richard Gibson]

Class is a bad idea for a few reasons, but principal among them in my 
mind is the fact that per section 4.2 of RFC 1034, the concept of zone 
is subordinate to the concept of class—even if zone cuts were in the 
same places, example. in a new class would still be a distinct zone from 
example. in the Internet class.

On 7/8/19 13:20, Wessels, Duane wrote:
I'll probably regret this, but what about a COVERT class, instead type 
RR type? 

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop