On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 03:36:39PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > These abbreviations are about identifying the transport that is being used > for the DNS messages. One problem with Do53 is that it isn't specific > about the transport, because it covers both UDP and TCP. But it's a handy > abbreviation for DNS over traditional transports. It doesn't identify DNS > as a whole, just the framing of DNS messages in UDP and TCP.
The other day at ANRW, a paper was presented that compared performance of DoH, DoT, and Do53. It was unclear to me what transport the authors had used for their Do53 measaurements - and it makes a significant difference. I don't know, even now, whether the comparison was apples-to-apples or not. "Do53" is a handy abbreviation, but I'm concerned that using it as a coequal peer of DoT and DoH will lead to fuzzy thinking. -- Evan Hunt -- [email protected] Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
