On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, Paul Ebersman wrote:

> I was also one of those folks that put things in txt zone files for
> years. My whole IP address management was comments in the in-addr.arpa
> zones. While I went to dynamic zones to make DNSSEC easy and lost that,
> I still see value in things that should be attachable to a zone but not
> zone data and not something you wanted to "publish" in the open DNS.
> 
> ebersman> I think we're allowed to replace something after 20+ years ;)
> 
> ebersman> Things that might go in:
> 
> ebersman> - AXFR/IXFR/*XFR
> ebersman> - zone meta data (create/modify/delete/digital-sigs)
> ebersman> - "covert" data
> 
> dmahoney> As far as extending/replacing the AXFR protocol, this is
> dmahoney> great, however, I still see an orthogonal need for the thing
> dmahoney> I'm asking for: Parseable metadata.  For humans.  Not as a
> dmahoney> gateway to some sort of clever signaling or key-transfer
> dmahoney> protocol.  Analagous more to HINFO than TXT.
> 
> Actually, I think this moves your goal nicely. If we could have things
> marked as "not zone data, sensitive" and dealt with only over a covert
> channel after various auth/acl checks are done, it would be easy enough
> to have metadata that won't leak.
> 
> Then we define some of these things we consider "private"/non-zone.
> 
> dmahoney> I also envision the "presentation format" looking like a
> dmahoney> regular comment so non-compatible implementations that tried
> dmahoney> to load a zone with these simply ignored them as they do
> dmahoney> regular comments.  Similar, perhaps to how server-side
> dmahoney> includes work in the web world.
> 
> Legacy/non-compatible would fall out because they wouldn't ever see this
> because they'd fail whatever auth/negotiation was necessary to believe
> that sending covert/metadata was OK and they'd never get it.
> 

Right, my argument was more in the case of the "without covert".  I.e. 
you've dumped your zone on bind and loaded it into NSD.  On disk, not 
wire.

-Dan

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to