Ack. Tnx. On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:56 AM Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2019, at 10:59, Steve Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > At the risk of revealing that I haven't been following this thread > carefully, I don't understand how a resolver is supposed to know all of the > special names. Resolvers that are configured to know that invalid, local, > onion, and test are special will not know about the next name that's put on > the special list. > > The pragmatic answer right now is that vendors and package maintainers do > a good job with their default configurations. DNS software tends to get > upgraded frequently enough in applications with significant user bases that > this goes some of the distance. > > I can see your point though that there might be some merit in having a way > to retrieve a current list, or at least telling whether the list you have > is up-to-date. I don't know that I think it's a particularly pressing > problem though (I think DNSSEC trust anchor distribution for the root zone > is higher up the priority list, for example). > > > Joe >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
