Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I support this. DLV was a mistake > > yup. but resistance was futile. It was very useful at the beginning, especially before the root was signed. I used it to get DNSSEC from a number of TLDs and could not have done that without DLV. It served its purpose well, and it should be formally retired and this document should get published. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
