Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> writes:
> > On Sep 30, 2019, at 7:06 PM, Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Which raises another question: Can an OPT RR legitimately carry more
> >> than one EDE option, and thereby communicate multiple errors? Such as
> >> perhaps the above hypothetical with some RRSIGs expired, and some not
> >> yet vlid.
> >
> > Yes, the draft discusses including multiple EDE reports.
>
> I appears that text discussing the possibility of multiple EDE values
> present in earlier drafts may have been inadvertently removed in -07.
> I think such text should be restored, making it clear that the OPT
> record may contain multiple pertinent EDE values.
Good catch. That notion did get removed by accident.
How does this sound:
Senders MAY include more than one EDE option and receivers MUST be
able to accept (but not necessarily process or act on) multiple
EDE options in a DNS message.
--
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
