Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> writes:

> > On Nov 13, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > I added this text to the next version:
> > 
> >      <t>When the response grows beyond the requestor's UDP payload
> >      size <xref target="RFC6891" />, servers SHOULD truncate messages
> >      by dropping EDE options before dropping other data from
> >      packets.  Implementations SHOULD set the truncation bit when
> >      dropping EDE options.</t>
> 
> Are you sure that setting TC=1 when EDE doesn't fit is the right
> trade-off?  I'm somewhat skeptical...

Well, that's what the other specs say.  We could break from that, you're
right, and it's a discussion I was going to mention in Singapore for
that matter.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to