Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> writes: Hi Paul,
Thanks for the considerations and the changes made. > > 3. Though the document has "relaxed" the specification to not require a > > loopback address/interface, this is still functionally a no-op since > > it still requires only serving data from the localhost. That's not > > really relaxing it much; it just means functionally the same thing > > with a slightly wider view of how to implement it. > > Please note that the word "localhost" no longer appears in the > document. True, but that's largely the semantics around the loopback. The phrases "same host" and "same server" appear instead, which is functionally nearly the same thing from a logical point of view. Anyway, I'm not suggesting it change. So I shouldn't send this mail. > > 10. For A.1, second paragraph about LocalRoot, can you replace with the > > following text (assuming you agree with it): > > > > The LocalRoot project (<https://localroot.isi.edu/>) is a service > > that embodies many of the ideas in this document and is operated in > > cooperation with USC/ISI's root server. It distributes the root > > zone by AXFR, but also offers DNS NOTIFY messages when the LocalRoot > > system sees that the root zone has changed, providing potentially > > faster updates to local root implementations. It additionally > > provides secured AXFR transfers, which helps defeat issues with > > unsigned glue records being potentially modified in transit (see > > Section 2). > > I'm hesitant to do this because the text you give here is different > than the text on the web site with respect to the status of the > server, and with respect to the availability of TSIG. Huh? Can you clarify "with respect to the availability of TSIG"? -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
