Petr Špaček <[email protected]> writes: > I will provide the opposite opinion: > DP bit is not *needed* for EDE. > > If I'm proven wrong in future we can specify DP bit in a separate > document and update EDE RFC.
That's actually what we did Petr (DP is in a separate draft and may or may not even try for adoption). But thanks, your voice matches what looks to be the rest to the norm. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
