Hi Dave, Just on this point:
> On 2. Dec 2019, at 23:42, Dave Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2) I find the Implementation Status section (8) actually quite >> interesting for this document and maybe it should be considered to >> keep it in the document for final publication. > > I personally am in favor of this, not just for this document but for > all RFCs. RFC 6982 recommends that the section be removed, but I'd > be happy to help evolve that recommendation. RFC6982 recommends this because usually it's more important to have this information during the life-time of a draft (to understand the maturity of the protocol) but then it might quickly get out-dated after publication. However, we had also drafts were we retained the section for final publication because e.g. the whole draft was based on one specific implementation. I think that is also the case here and there is nothing in RFC6982 that permits keeping this information in the draft (if it seen as still useful in future). Mirja _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
