Michael StJohns <m...@nthpermutation.com> writes:

> This is sort of what I meant.  Still trying to get the authors to home
> in a definition for small/static and large/dynamic.

Random thought while reading the thread: we could state something very
small and simple rather than trying to approximate the future growth in
computing and DNS data sizes simultaneously.  Instead we could say
something simple like (word smithing needed) "ZONEMD is likely not a
suitable solution for zones where the calculations required to create
the record on the DNS operator's infrastructure takes longer than 1/10th
the average zone update frequency."

Wes Hardaker

DNSOP mailing list

Reply via email to