Yes, I believe that suggestion is much stronger and expresses the intent and meaning better.
Thanks, Scott -----Original Message----- From: DNSOP <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 1:19 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [DNSOP] DNS for Cloud Resources in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-08 Could we make the last sentence stronger, perhaps with a statement like this from the US CERT WPAD Name Collision Vulnerability alert dated May 23, 2016? "Globally unique names do prevent any possibility of collision at the present or in the future and they make DNSSEC trust manageable. Consider using a registered and fully qualified domain name (FQDN) from global DNS as the root for enterprise and other internal namespaces." _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
