The plan in this draft is that NS2 would eventually replace NS records.
if so there's a much larger set of changes we'd have to consider. for one
thing NS2 should be slabbed (one record containing a compound rdata set); for
another it would have to incorporate what DS does now (also as a slab).
Take a look at draft-tapril-ns2-00 in which NS2 has ten subfields
including one for the DS or DNSKEY. Like I said, it's very kitchen-sinky.
this still doesn't feel like the right era to begin the DNSv2 effort.
I wouldn't disagree. I understand the motivation to have some way to say
above the cut whether the below-cut NS speak DoT or DoH or whatever, but
this is way more than that.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
