On 13. 05. 20 12:25, Joe Abley wrote: > Hi Lada, > > On 13 May 2020, at 03:19, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: > >> IANA did an early review of the draft in $subj. As you can see below, >> Michelle proposes that the XSLT stylesheet be removed upon publication of >> the RFC. >> >> I am personally not much in favour of doing so. First, I don't expect that >> any future changes to the stylesheet will be necessary or even possible: the >> rules for updating YANG modules (sec. 11 in RFC 7950) effectively block any >> substantial changes. So, if it ever turned out that the way how the >> registries are modelled in YANG needs to be change, it would most likely >> require an entirely new YANG module. >> >> And, more importantly, the XSLT stylesheet is also kind of a formal record >> of the consensus regarding the mapping of registry data to YANG (there are >> indeed a few other options how to do it). If a change was necessary (modulo >> errata), then it is IMO appropriate to run it through the IETF process again. >> >> Any thoughts on this? > > You seem to have addressed Michelle's concern, above. Did you give that > response to her as well as sending it to this list? What did she think?
Yes, I did. Michelle's answer was: We can see what others think as the document goes through the process. During Last Call we will provide another review and comments. I will now submit a new revision addressing the (minor) issues that we have collected so far. Then the document could IMO proceed to WGLC. Lada > > > Joe > -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
