On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:09 PM Daniel Migault <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I support the adoption of the document.
> draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements-00 [1] references this
> document and would like it to become a standard.
>
> I suspect that many felt that [2] had a flavor of call for adoption. I was
> myself surprised to see the call for adoption.
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
>
> [1]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fXmzHFzh153OO01hA5Oq8-T-fO8/
> [2]
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements-00
>
>
With the disclaimer that I'm a co-author, I also support adoption of
draft-huque-dnsop-ns-revalidation.

To answer Daniel's question, the first thread was where I introduced the
draft on the mailing list. Although the DNSOP chairs chimed in and asked
for general review there, it was not an official call for adoption. Tim's
message that we are responding to now is the adoption call.

Shumon.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to