On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 2:38 PM Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 4:54 PM Tony Finch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > 1. If TargetName is not in-bailiwick and is not ".", terminate the >> procedure. >> > 2. If SvcPriority is 0: >> > * If TargetName is ".", terminate the procedure. >> > * Otherwise, perform a SVCB "follow-up" query for TargetName and >> add all >> > returned records, including any records added by this procedure. >> > If any SVCB records were added, terminate. >> > 3. Perform A and AAAA follow-up queries for TargetName (or for the >> owner name if >> > TargetName is "."), and add all returned records. >> >> I think the actual wording you want here is "in the same zone" not "in >> bailiwick". >> > ... > > Thanks, I will make that correction. > I think the condition might be, "both in bailiwick and in the same zone" meaning "in bailiwick and not below a zone cut"? It may be overly explicit to say "not below a zone cut (delegation point)", but "in the same zone" can be erroneously interpreted by implementers who fail to recognize the pitfalls of zone cuts. I might be overthinking it, though. Brian
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
