On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 09:04:02PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Sep 11, 2020, at 20:48, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ???On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 09:40:11AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > >> and why is it a RR type at all. An EDNS option or a opcode is better > >> suited for this sort of thing. > > > > +1. > > An RR type can be signed and distributed differently and allow for > preloading of (distributed) caches which enhanced the decentralization of > recursive DNS servers.
an authority server's capabilities are with respect to a zone. for example, dnssec availability, dnssec details like algs, maximum message sizes, truncation policy, willingness to do persistent TCP (or QUIC) sessions. our community seems hell bent on gradually evolving the system toward the needs that micro-leasing would address, without actually understanding that or getting there. _it's never about the server_. -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
