> On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:55 PM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: No Objection
Hi Murray, thanks for the comments. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I support Benjamin's DISCUSS about the IANA issues. I'd also suggest adding > text about what the possible values of the "Implementation Requirement" column > are and what they mean. Based on the discussion with Benjamin that column has been dropped. > Further, what's the "Mnemonic" used for? That word > appears nowhere in the document other than in the column headings in this > section. I assumed that was relatively standard thing in protocol registry tables. It probably came from using the DNSKEY algorithm registry as a model. https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers/dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml#dns-sec-alg-numbers-1 > > Roman made some other good editorial suggestions. Please check those out. > > Section 3.3.1 says: "SIMPLE is a good choice for zones that are small and/or > stable, but probably not good for zones that are large and/or dynamic." > There's no alternative presented for large/dynamic zones. Are there plans to > develop such a thing? I have some ideas that I have shared on the DNSOP list and in some presentations about zone digests. Others probably have ideas as well. Nothing is to the stage of being written down as an Internet Draft yet, as far as I know. DW
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
