Hi Duane!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Wessels, Duane
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 8:28 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Tim Wicinski
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Wessels, Duane
> <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12:
> (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> 
> 
> > On Oct 12, 2020, at 9:24 AM, Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Duane!
> >
> > Thanks for the extensive changes in -13.  They address my concerns.  I have
> left one remaining comment about clarifying "provably secure" with a
> reference.  Otherwise, I've cleared my ballot.
> 
> Thanks Roman,
> 
> Instead of "provably secure," how does this look to you:
> 
>    1.  The verifier MUST first determine whether or not to expect DNSSEC
>        records in the zone.  By examining locally configured trust
>        anchors, and, if necessary, querying for and validating DS RRs in
>        the parent zone, the verifier knows whether or not the zone to be
>        verified should include DNSSEC keys and signatures.  For zones
>        where signatures are not expected, or if DNSSEC validation is not
>        performed, digest verification continues at step 4 below.
> 
>    2.  For zones where signatures are expected, the existence of the
>        apex ZONEMD record MUST be validated.  If the DNSSEC data proves
>        the ZONEMD RRSet does not exist, digest verification cannot
>        occur.  If the DNSSEC data proves the ZONEMD does exist, but is
>        not found in the zone, digest verification MUST NOT be considered
>        successful.
> 
>    3.  For zones where signatures are expected, the SOA and ZONEMD
>        RRSets MUST have valid signatures, chaining up to a trust anchor.
>        If DNSSEC validation of the SOA or ZONEMD RRSets fails, digest
>        verification MUST NOT be considered successful.

This language looks good to me and is even better than a reference.  Thanks for 
clarifying the text further.

Roman

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to