On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, Roy Arends wrote:
As for version -01, the authors propose to separate the document into two:
(1) A document that discusses the motivation for private space top level
domains, provides recommendations for people setting them up, etc.
The IETF / DNSOP should not recommend setting up private space TLDs by
instructing people how to do this.
(2) A document to note that ISO policy supports using ISO3166 User Assigned
code elements to anchor private namespaces, recognise that use and, finally,
recommend against use of these code elements for any other purposes that cause
operational or security problems (e.g. due to collisions with delegations in
the root zone).
I still don't see the value in this, but there is also no harm done
describing this. So I am ambivalent on this.
In general, I'm mostly afraid that this/these document(s) will eat up a
lot of DNSOP resources/time, seeing more Special Domain discussions and
all, while naming things is really outside of IETF/DNSOPS area.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
