Dear WG,
The WGLC period for draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang has finished.
From the comments on the mailing list of DNSOP participants who
contributed and/or provided feedback on the document, I conclude that
the authors have included and processed their comments.
The chairs feel that the draft is ready to move forward.
Thanks for the reviews,
— Benno
On 16/10/2020 15:49, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang/
This looks good to me.
One minor item. Is it possible to add text in a way that instructs
implementer they SHOULD NOT add "Obsolete" entries when populating?
I think we need to assume that an implementer is familiar with the
YANG spec, and this is just one of the rules to follow. Specifically,
RFC 7950 says:
o "obsolete" means that the definition is obsolete and SHOULD NOT be
implemented and/or can be removed from implementations.
This should IMO be sufficient and we needn't repeat in in this document.
Ah yes. And 7950 is referenced in the introduction, so I guess that
should be enough.
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
