Seems like a good idea to make this more consistent. A correction for the first paragraph: change
DNSSEC is primarily described in [RFC4033], [RFC4034], and [RFC4035]. DNSSEC commonly uses two resource records beyond those defined in RFC 4034: DS [RFC3658] and NSEC3 [RFC5155]. to DNSSEC is primarily described in [RFC4033], [RFC4034], and [RFC4035]. DNSSEC commonly uses two resource records beyond those defined in RFC 4034: NSEC3 and NSEC3PARAM [RFC5155]. DS is specified in RFC 4034. I suppose it's OK to omit CDS and CDNSKEY sinec they don't have any separate IANA considerations :-) Is it possible to ask IANA to combine the registries a bit? I would prefer it if there were one page of DNS parameter assignments, or maybe two with a separate page for DNSSEC. At the moment there are: https://www.ietf.org/assignments/dns-parameters https://www.ietf.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers https://www.ietf.org/assignments/dnskey-flags https://www.ietf.org/assignments/dnssec-nsec3-parameters https://www.ietf.org/assignments/sig-alg-numbers And https://www.ietf.org/assignments/tsig-algorithm-names which is misfiled - it is not listed under the DNS heading at https://www.ietf.org/assignments/ Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ defend the right to speak, write, worship, associate, and vote freely _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
