Hiya,

On 01/01/2021 17:58, Paul Hoffman wrote:
The WG has already adopted the revised GOST document as a WG item;
what you are proposing (if the current use is negligible) would be in
the opposite direction.
I wasn't "proposing" that, just posing it as a possible
option that might or might not be sensible to consider
depending on the facts relating to usage if/when we can
get 'em. Absent usage information, I'm not at all sure
whether or not any change from the status quo is warranted.

Cheers,
S.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to