As requested (I'm not engaged here enough to understand the terms of engagement, so my apologies for using an interaction form I'm accustomed to), moving discussion from https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/issues/287 to here:
The SVCB draft basically mandates a fallback to A/AAAA. I think that this is not universal and that this should instead be made an option. For HTTP, the fallback is necessary. For a new protocol, a fallback could be undesirable. Especially if you want to deploy that protocol using a service name on which you have already deployed HTTP. If you don't want your HTTP servers getting connection attempts for the new protocol, the fallback is more nuisance than useful. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
