Thank you Warren and Ben for your feedback.

If anyone else has any feedback, questions, or concerns please let me know over the weekend so I can prepare any discussion items before the RZERC call next Tuesday.

Thank You!

—Tim

On 7 Jan 2021, at 9:22, Warren Kumari wrote:

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:34 PM Ben Schwartz
<[email protected]> wrote:

I support the deployment of ZONEMD in the root zone. This is a valuable protection today and a prerequisite for many of the proposals in DPRIVE.

Unsurprisingly, me too.

The root is the poster child for ZONEMD...

W


On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:26 PM Tim April <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello DNSOP,

Forwarding along to DNSOP as well. If you have any comments or feedback on the two proposed RZERC documents, please let me know by January 15th.

Thanks,

--tim

Forwarded message:

From: Tim April [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RZERC Draft Documents For Review
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:49:06 -0500

Hello IETF,

I wanted to provide a quick update on the work going on in the RZERC. We have been discussing and iterating on the two documents attached and we have reached the point where we would like to gather feedback from the various constituencies represented in the RZERC. As your local member, I will be collecting any feedback on the documents ahead of our next meeting on the 19th of January. If possible, please provide any feedback here or directly to me the 15th of January.

Document 1: Recommendations Regarding Signing Root Zone Name Server Data - This document outlines the benefits and potential concerns related to signing the root-servers.net zone. It recommends that the ICANN org conduct studies into the impact that signing the root-servers.net zone might have.

Document 2: Adding Zone Data Protections to the Root Zone - This document discusses recommends that the Root Server Operators, Public Technical Identifiers and the Root Zone Maintainer do the necessary work to create a plan for deploying ZONEMD, ensuring that it would not negatively impact the distribution of the zone data to the Root Server System. It also recommends that the DNS and Internet community be notified of the changes all under the assumption that draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest becomes an RFC.

Again, if you have any comments or feedback on the documents, please provide them be January 15th.

--tim

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop



--
The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the
complexities of his own making.
  -- E. W. Dijkstra

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to