On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:56 PM Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is another point in favor of doing QNAME minimization. > RFC7816 (technically experimental, but recommended.) > > It kind of makes the query order moot; the resolver looks up the shorter > name first even while resolving the longer name. > Is there any data or even a hint of how widely that experiment has been deployed or implemented? -MSK
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
