On Jun 16, 2021, at 10:39 AM, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks. I'm a bit confused though. Your draft says "Non-address records > that appear in the Additional section are not considered glue as that term is > used in existing RFCs". You also quote RFC 2181: '"Glue" above includes any > record in a zone file that is not properly part of that zone, including > nameserver records ...'. Is RFC 2181 not an existing RFC?
Of course it is an existing RFC: that's why we referenced it. Section 3 of the draft has three quotes about glue. The first two make it clear that RFC 1034 only considers glue to be addresses, while RFC 2181 does not. The conclusion of the draft is that the original definition is the correct one. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
