> On Sep 3, 2021, at 5:29 PM, Jean Mahoney via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > Reviewer: Jean Mahoney > Review result: Ready with Nits > > Reviewer: Jean Mahoney > Review result: Ready with nits > > A well-written, easy-to-read document. Love Appendix A!
Jean, Thank you for the review and kind words. > > Question about Appendix A.2 and Updates - Should this document also update RFC > 1536? > > Current text in A.2: > The informational document [RFC1536] states UDP is the "chosen > protocol for communication though TCP is used for zone transfers." > That statement should now be considered in its historical context and > is no longer a proper reflection of modern expectations. Seems reasonable to consider, assuming a BCP can update an Informational RFC? > > Nits: > > General - Document status (Informational, Standards Track, etc.) should be > capitalized, and Standards Track is not hyphenated (There's just one instance > of hyphenation). > > Section 2.4 - 35%of / 35% of There is an embedded XML comment in the source and apparently it renders inconsistently. I've added more whitespace so it should be fixed regardless. > > Section 3 - transport.[TDNS] / transport [TDNS]. Fixed. > > Section 5.1 > Current: "the steady-state of lost resources as a result is a 'DNS wedgie'." > Perhaps: "the steady state of the resulting lost resources is a 'DNS > wedgie'." Yes, thank you. > > Section 5.2 - Expand the acronym KSK. Done. > > Section 7 - The Acknowledgments section should be located just above the > Authors' Addresses section. It looks like the names are supposed to be in > alphabetical order, but they aren't quite. I moved it to the end of <middle> in the XML source. > > Section 9 - fragmenetation / fragmentation Fixed. > > Section 10 - Since DNS over UDP and TCP use / Since DNS over UDP and TCP > uses Fixed. > > Section 11.2 - [ROLL_YOU_ROOT] has a mangled author name and a TBD. The TBD is fixed. The author names look fine to me, but maybe "Müller" isn't rendering properly for everyone? If thats not it then I'll need you to be more specific. > > Appendix A - The construction "The [RFCNNNN] document..." (in A.3, A.4, A.5, > A.7, and A.13) reads oddly to me. Perhaps "This document [RFCNNNN] ". Agreed. These have been changed. > > Appendix A.8 - The verb tenses are mixed in this section. Fixed. > > Appendix A.32 - as a a / as a Fixed. > > There are other nits I could pick more easily if this doc was in a GitHub > repo. > They can be left to the RPC to clean up. :-) FYI it is in github and I have a pull request for your review at https://github.com/jtkristoff/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements/pull/8 DW
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
