It appears that Paul Wouters  <[email protected]> said:
>On Jan 6, 2022, at 20:48, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> George Michaelson wrote on 2022-01-06 16:50:
>>> for a 200 in 200,000,000 problem? Ban it.
>> 
>> i agree that we should ban it, but not on the basis of its infrequency of 
>> use. rather, on the basis of data provenance.
>
>Who wants to be the first to fail resolving adobe.net 😀

Since it's only a redirect to adobe.com, I doubt many people would care.

>Seriously though, this draft is not about banning certain deployments or not. 
>Its only concern is MAY vs SHOULD vs MUST require the
>found glue to be added to the response and potentially cause TC. 

We finally appear to be coalescing around the correct answer, MUST NOT.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to