On Apr 13, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:
> If we do it as both a reference of DNSSEC and a BCP, then I think we should 
> add:
> 
> RFC 8901      Multi-Signer DNSSEC Models
> RFC 8027 a.k.a. BCP 207       DNSSEC Roadblock Avoidance
> RFC 7583      DNSSEC Key Rollover Timing Considerations
> RFC 7129      Authenticated Denial of Existence in the DNS
> RFC 4470      Minimally Covering NSEC Records and DNSSEC On-line Signing
> 
> I would not include these that you included:
> 
> RFC 9157      Revised IANA Considerations for DNSSEC [It's IETF administrivia]
> RFC 6014      Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC [It's 
> IETF administrivia]
> RFC 5933      Use of GOST Signature Algorithms in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource 
> Records for DNSSEC [Algo is dead]
> 
> Otherwise, I agree with you.

I agree with PaulW's list of inclusions. I would say that RFC 9157 and RFC 6014 
should still be in draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp, but in a separate section for 
those readers who care about the IANA registries. RFC 5933 is not yet dead, but 
will be before draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp is published.

I would add the following that are listed as blank in Tim's chart:

RFC 6975        Signaling Cryptographic Algorithm Understanding in DNS Security 
Extensions (DNSSEC)
   Relevant
RFC 6725        DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry Updates
   For the IANA-ish section

I do not understand why the following and are listed as "No", given that they 
relate to the DNSSEC trust anchors, and thus are relevant to implementors. I 
would say they all should be listed:

RFC 8509        A Root Key Trust Anchor Sentinel for DNSSEC
RFC 8145        Signaling Trust Anchor Knowledge in DNS Security Extensions 
(DNSSEC)
RFC 7958        DNSSEC Trust Anchor Publication for the Root Zone
RFC 7646        Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors

(I agree that RFC 4986 does not need to be in the draft because it is just 
requirements.)

Because we are talking about this in light of adding a section to 
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp, the following can be excluded because they are 
already in the draft:

RFC 9077
RFC 8624
RFC 8198
RFC 8078
RFC 7344
RFC 6840
RFC 6781
RFC 5702
RFC 5155
RFC 5011
RFC 4509
RFC 4035
RFC 4034
RFC 4033

--Paul Hoffman

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to