Hi Benno -
On 7/7/2022 11:10 AM, Benno Overeinder wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 07/07/2022 16:58, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Jul 7, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Benno Overeinder <[email protected]> wrote:
Gentle reminder, the poll runs until July 9.
Can you say how the poll will be used? There was pretty strong
push-back after the original announcement, and it's thus unclear how
the poll results will be acted on.
It helps us and the WG itself to prioritise WG activities and start a
regular WG call for adoption of a number of documents. We will share
the results of the poll with the WG and how to make an initial
selection of documents that will be included in the WG call for
adoption process. We currently have 6 drafts for which the authors
have asked WG adoption, but that is too much new work for the WG to
work on.
Any feedback on improving the process to prioritise work in the WG is
welcome.
All of that is a good and just reason to send out calls for adoption.
But the point of the previous messages was that the poll was not the way
to do that. Basically, making a poll choice without providing context
and an opportunity for discussion a) lacks transparency (in that when
the chairs make a decision, the WG has no basis on which to evaluate
that decision), b) lacks nuance (in that the choices provided do not
cover some shadings of what to do - e.g., not ready for consideration),
c) lacks WG participation (a discussion about a document gets us to a
better result than blind voting).
The fact that the chairs did not respond to the original messages is
also a bit problematic.
Later, Mike
Best,
-- Benno
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
