Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote on 2022-08-01 08:29:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 02:31:48PM +0200,
Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <[email protected]> wrote
a message of 89 lines which said:
...
I agree and I think publication of these drafts would be a good idea
(may be with status Experimental since, as Joe Abley said, there is
clearly no IETF consensus). Note that I am skeptical about their use:
most people who "preempt" .eth, .bitcoin, .web3 or .myownprotocol will
not read the RFC and, if they do, won't follow it. But at least we
will be able to say that we tried and we have a solution (and not a
ridiculous one such as "pay ICANN 185 000 US $").
+1. the namespace will be locally augmented. we should describe a way.
i'm particularly interested in whether the root zone should have an NS
for the private-label tld(s) (.alt or ._alt or whatever) with an NS of
"localhost" and a dnssec "opt out" indicator so that these private tlds
can fit into the authenticity infrastructure.
--
P Vixie
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
