> Il 08/08/2022 12:16 CEST Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > I caution against those approaches that would set such a high bar that they > would require researchers to fork out hundreds of thousands of dollars on > application fees alone plus who knows how much else for, as someone else > wrote, an uncertain outcome. They'll simply go elsewhere. That in itself > would encourage squatting (or whatever you want to call it). The benefits of > avoiding squatting accrue not only to those researchers, but to those who use > their technology, and others as well. > I apologize for being the nasty guy with the colourful language (by the way, again, this is not a technical discussion but a policy one), but given the above, I would really like to hear your answer to these questions: 1) Why should these people get for free something which everybody else is required to pay $200'000 for? 2) You are basically saying that we should give these people a $200'000 house for free and make it the best house we can offer, or else they will just ignore the rules and squat the one they like the most. Do you really think that we should yield to this kind of reasoning?
-- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange [email protected] mailto:[email protected] Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
