first read of rfcdiff

        guidance for DNSSEC. This document obsoletes <xref target="RFC6944"/>.

- no targets allowed in the abstract :)

- You removed RFC8174 from the 2119 text for no good reason :)

- SHA1 changed for validation  from MUST to SHOULD NOT. This is the
  discussion item for the WG :)

- GOST to MUST NOT, ok but could add GOST 2012 as per 
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis

- You changed NOT RECOMMENDED terminology to SHOULD NOT (I think I
  originally had that and Ondrey / the WG preferred NOT RECOMMENDED).
  Either works for me.

- Some updated text, clarifications and common practises. all good
  changes.

- NIT: The SHA-256 is RECOMMENDED [for the] DS and CDS algorithm[s].

Paul

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to